What lens do you want most?

[JMS]

<div>The title says it all. Mine would have to be the 200mm f/2 Nikkor.</div>

[JMS]

bump<div></div>

[canonist]

<div>Does it have to be a real lens? Or can I make it up? </div>

[coppertop]

<DIV>Currently in production but out of reach.... Canon 400mm f2.8L IS</DIV>
<DIV>Currently in production but within reach... Canon or Sigma 180mm f3.5 Macro</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Wishful thinking.... 200-500mm f4L IS that's weather sealed, internal zoom/focus, under five pounds, sharp as a tack with or without a teleconverter.&nbsp; As I said, wishful thinking.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>

[ckhd]

<div></div><div>Canon EF 16-35L 2.8 II</div><div> </div><div>Too much money, so I'm going to get the EF 17-40L instead</div><br><br>Message Edited by ckhd on <span class="date_text">06-23-2007</span> <span class="time_text">06:04 PM</span>

[canonist]

<div>The 600mm would be nice, also the 400mm f2.8. How about a 30-600mm f2.8 L IS USM internal focusing, under 4 pounds, sharp with and without a tc, and have 1:1 macro capabilities? Yep, thats wishfull thinking. And maybe a 30mm L f1.8 15x macro, IS USM, that might not be too far away.</div>

[JMS]

Well, I meant real... My fantasy lens would be an AF-S VR 8-1600 f/1, macro to 35x. Tack sharp, and only weighing 1 lb, as well as fitting in an 8 inch long fixed body.<br><div></div>

[canonist]

<div>Whoa, lets try to keep things reasonably possible. But I guyess its your post so you can do whatever you want. The Canon EF 28-300mm L would be nice also.</div>

[moltogordo]

Two more lenses would make me happy: the 10-20mm Sigma and the Tamron 180mm f3.5 Macro. Those are musts. But I covet several others: the Pentax 14mm f2.8, the Pentax 35mm f2, the Sigma 8mm fisheye, and having never had a real donkey dik before, I would not say no to a Bigma.<br><div></div>

[JMS]

<div><br><blockquote><hr>moltogordo wrote:<br>... I would not say no to a Bigma.<br><div></div><hr></blockquote>Phallic symbols! Yes!<br></div>

[peirceman]

<div></div><div><br><blockquote><div><hr></div><div>JMS wrote:</div><div>Phallic symbols! Yes!<br><hr></div></blockquote>Why would you go there?:(<br><div></div></div>

[the_jclguru]

<div>Fantasy Lens - A 1x-2x Canon Converter that worked like a zoom.</div><div> </div><div>Real Lens - Get rid of my 600mm F4 non/is and replace it with a 500mm F4 IS.</div><div> </div><div>Doug</div>

[Davidw]

<div>400 f2.8 AF-S VR or 300 f2.8 AF-S VR, and the 200 f2 AF-S VR.</div>