![]() |
| |||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Do you think these images are good for doing HDR??
I did under and over exposures for these images. Which ones are good for HDR and which ones are not??
Here they are:
1. http://s1087.photobucket.com/albums/...t=IMG_0442.jpg
2. http://s1087.photobucket.com/albums/...IMG_0430-1.jpg
3. http://s1087.photobucket.com/albums/...t=IMG_0413.jpg
4. http://s1087.photobucket.com/albums/...t=IMG_0407.jpg
5. http://s1087.photobucket.com/albums/...t=IMG_0401.jpg
6. http://s1087.photobucket.com/albums/...t=IMG_0395.jpg
7. http://s1087.photobucket.com/albums/...t=IMG_0469.jpg
8. http://s1087.photobucket.com/albums/...t=IMG_0463.jpg
9. http://s1087.photobucket.com/albums/...t=IMG_0456.jpg
10. http://s1087.photobucket.com/albums/...t=IMG_0430.jpg
11. http://s1087.photobucket.com/albums/...t=IMG_0427.jpg
12. http://s1087.photobucket.com/albums/...t=IMG_0422.jpg
For HDR to have real benefit in terms of extended dynamic range, any image where you can't capture the entire brightness range in a single shot would benefit. You can toss any set into the HDR cooker for artistic reasons though or just to see how it turns out. There are no set rules.
Based on the idea of expanding dynamic range alone, 1-3, 7-9, 11 and 12. 10 looks like a repeat of one of the others.
Life is too short to bother with the criminally inane.
RF-Photography Website/Blog
The Vicarious Traveler