+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20

Thread: No, buying a camera does not make you a "photographer..."

  1. #11
    Senior Member ChanTran's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Aurora, IL
    Posts
    3,173
    Quote Originally Posted by Nod View Post
    Thanks for that link Paul, I didn't realize that I was a "Professional" photographer - if that portfolio is the standard requirement. I've seen a few of those "moms" around here and of course they frown on me because I shoot Sony (Why don't you move up to a better camera ?). What's sad is that some people pay these folks for that quality of work.
    Do you earn money from photography? If not then you are not a professional. But this woman is a pro as it seemed that she did earn money from her work. It has nothing to do with the quality of the work. It has to do whether or not someone earns money for the work.

    In fact the word Amateur means doing the art not for money but it doesn't mean the work should be of low quality. Art is like Love, it's wonderful if it's given freely. If it's for sale then..........
    Chan Tran

  2. #12
    Senior Member BobF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    15,310
    For some of those shots she almost needs a 2257 statement.
    Life is too short to bother with the criminally inane.

    RF-Photography Website/Blog
    The Vicarious Traveler

  3. #13
    Senior Member suci's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    TEXAS
    Posts
    9,160
    Quote Originally Posted by mrchile View Post
    I got better shots with my old Kodak 110.
    Well, of course. Don't disparage my Pentax Auto 110 by making such comparisons.
    But then really the camera is not the problem.
    janos
    ars longa vita brevis

  4. #14
    Senior Member LouR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    2,160
    Quote Originally Posted by BobF View Post
    For some of those shots she almost needs a 2257 statement.
    No person in those pix should knowingly allow themselves to be seen by anyone going to her website or Facebook page. "Hey, aren't you the girl with the demon eyes?"

  5. #15
    Senior Member Railphotog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Atlantic Canada
    Posts
    253
    She sure is a pro, see some of her photos are even date stamped!
    Bob Boudreau

  6. #16
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    6
    I'm not so sure that its photography she's selling.

  7. #17
    Senior Member LouR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    2,160
    Quote Originally Posted by aponi View Post
    I'm not so sure that its photography she's selling.
    This forum needs a "like" feature.

  8. #18
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    6
    chuckle, you know when I first saw this thread I thought my gosh this is just mean making fun of someone like this. I'm so not going to post any pictures in case they come after me like this. Then I clicked on the link and wow each picture is more horrible than the one before. It has to be a joke, no one is that bad accidentally. Heck even my phone has a red eye removal tool on it.

  9. #19
    Senior Member JudoJohn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    USA/ MO
    Posts
    175
    it's amazing-- and not in a good way.

  10. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    MARYLAND
    Posts
    485
    these photos stink. maybe she forgot to read the manual like all the other people that have big cameras.
    JERRY

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts